More than a year after the state launched the Pathways to Coverage program, offering Medicaid in exchange for work or other state-approved activities, advocates say the program is too difficult…
Blog
Beginning in 2012, Georgia consumers who purchase individual health insurance policies will have access to more information about how their premium dollars are being spent AND will be eligible for rebates if their insurance company fails to provide sufficient value for the premium dollar.
These new standards, known as medical loss ratio (MLR) rules, are part of the Affordable Care Act and are designed to spur insurance companies to operate more transparently and to ensure that consumers get the most value for their premium dollars. Consumers will receive rebates if their insurance company fails to spend at least 80 percent of collected premiums on medical care or quality improvement activities, as compared to profits, administration, and marketing. It is estimated that Georgia consumers will receive approximately $42 million in rebates over the next three years.
The Georgia Department of Insurance, however, has made a request to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for an adjustment to these new standards, which would effectively weaken them. If the adjustment is approved, the rebates would be substantially reduced and Georgia consumers would lose out on an estimated $34 million in rebates they are slated to receive.
The MLR rules are exciting news for Georgia consumers, but they are at risk of being weakened. We need your voice to keep them strong and to ensure that Georgia consumers get the most value from their insurance plans. Here is what you can do:
1) Learn more about this issue by downloading our new issue brief, hot off the press from Georgians for a Healthy Future and Georgia Watch.
2) Take action on behalf of your organization: Georgians for a Healthy Future and Georgia Watch have teamed up to file public comments that explain why these standards are good for Georgia consumers and should go through as planned, and we’re asking you to add your voice to this effort. If your organization would like to sign onto these public comments, please e-mail us by 12pm Friday and we will add you to the growing list of groups asking that the request for an adjustment be denied.
3) Take action as an individual consumer: If you are an individual consumer and would like to make your voice heard, please contact us and we can walk you through how to file comments as an individual.
Thank you for your advocacy, and please let us know if we can answer any questions or provide additional resources on this important issue. Please share this information with friends, family and colleagues so we can ensure that Georgia consumers get the most value for their health insurance premium dollar.
Stay Connected
GHF In The News
Archive
- October 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- October 2023
- July 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- June 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009