More than a year after the state launched the Pathways to Coverage program, offering Medicaid in exchange for work or other state-approved activities, advocates say the program is too difficult…
Blog
HB 229 Tackles Problems of Backlogged and Unfair Medicaid Appeals
Both federal and state law grants Medicaid members and applicants the right to a fair hearing when Medicaid services are denied for reasons such as eligibility determination, frequency, or duration or intensity of services. When a Medicaid member is denied coverage he or she may dispute the denial by filing an appeal and request for a hearing with the Department of Community Health (DCH), the state agency that administers the Medicaid program. DCH processes the request and forwards it to the Office of State Administrative Hearings (OSAH) for a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ). The ALJ listens to testimony, reviews the evidence, and reaches an impartial decision. Federal law requires that when a Medicaid member requests an appeal a final decision must be made within 90 days, absent extenuating circumstances.
Delayed and unprocessed appeals requests work to deny individuals the right to a timely appeal. Many Georgia families have experienced very long delays in obtaining decisions on their appeal requests because DCH has failed to promptly refer their cases to the ALJ for hearing. Some individuals, particularly those whose medical services are being reduced or denied, may become increasingly ill while they wait. Many Medicaid members wait much longer than 90 days to have their cases resolved. H.B. 229 requires that DCH process appeals requests and refer them for hearing before an ALJ within 15 days.
Currently, after the ALJ hears a case and renders an impartial decision, DCH may appeal the decision to itself. Under Georgia law, DCH can “affirm, modify or reverse” the judge’s decision. This creates three problems: 1) it wastes time by adding at least 60 days to the appeal process; 2) it undermines the integrity of an appeal process that is supposed to be impartial and fair; 3) it wastes resources to have a full-blown hearing only to have department change the decision. In other agency hearings (including child support, special education, and Department of Natural Resource appeals), the judge’s decision is final.
H.B. 229 removes DCH’s ability to overturn the ALJ’s decision. An impartial ALJ’s decision is respected and stands as the Final Administrative Decision. If either DCH or the Medicaid member disagree with the ALJ’s, they may appeal to Superior Court.
H.B. 229 provides a fair and efficient administrative appeal process that protects the integrity and impartiality of the hearing before the administrative law judge.
Stay Connected
GHF In The News
Archive
- October 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- October 2023
- July 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- June 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009