More than a year after the state launched the Pathways to Coverage program, offering Medicaid in exchange for work or other state-approved activities, advocates say the program is too difficult…
Blog
By Cindy Zeldin
This post was originally published in the Savannah Morning News.
The health reform legislation being debated in Congress right now features a range of provisions aimed at increasing the number of Americans who have health insurance.
One of these elements is a significant expansion of Medicaid, the joint state-federal program that provides health insurance to low-income, uninsured families. Under the bill recently passed by the House, Medicaid would be available to individuals and families with incomes at or below 150 percent of the federal poverty level, or approximately $27,465 in annual income for a family of three.
This expansion would go into effect in 2013, with full federal financing in 2013 and 2014. After that, the federal government would pay for 91 percent of the cost of the newly eligible population, leaving the state to pay for the remaining nine percent beginning in 2015. The Georgia Department of Community Health recently estimated that Georgia’s share of this expansion would cost around $2.4 billion over the five-year period between 2015 and 2019.
Georgia’s Medicaid investment would come with an infusion of federal funds into our state that is tenfold Georgia’s share of the cost, and this influx of funds could spur an increase in economic activity throughout the state, providing tangible benefits that would far outweigh the initial $2.4 billion investment and catalyze economic activity through a process known as the “multiplier effect.”
Here’s how the multiplier effect works: Let’s assume, for the sake of this example, that the Department of Community Health’s estimate that the state would be responsible for about $2.4 billion over five years for the Medicaid expansion is correct. By spending that $2.4 billion, Georgia would draw down more than $24 billion in federal funds.
These combined funds would be pumped into the health care economy and utilized to pay for health services through payments to medical providers such as physicians, hospitals and pharmacies throughout the state. In turn, vendors up and down the medical supply chain would need to grow and hire more staff to meet the increased demand for the goods and services they produce.
Several state officials have expressed concern about Georgia’s anticipated share of the cost, and while this is a real expense the state would incur in a difficult budgetary climate, these concerns reflect an incomplete picture of these expenditures.
According to a recent study released by researchers at George Washington University, for every dollar a state invests in Medicaid, the multiplier effect generates an average return of three dollars in new economic activity within that state, creating jobs and increasing revenues for the state’s coffers. Here in Georgia, that $2.4 billion investment would generate about $80 billion in economic activity because it would be combined with federal funds and would provide a jolt to the economy with a 3 to 1 rate of return.
This is textbook economic stimulus. Low-income Georgians have real, unmet health needs that could be met through the access to the health system that the Medicaid program could bring them, and local businesses throughout the state would need to meet the increased demand. For example, in 2008, more than 1 million Georgians reported not seeing a doctor because of the cost. By extending Medicaid to more of the working poor, we can improve not only the health of our local citizens but also the health of many of our local businesses and economies.
Stay Connected
GHF In The News
Archive
- October 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- October 2023
- July 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- June 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009